Skip to main content

Free Text Similarity Checker – Compare Two Texts Online

Compare two texts and measure how similar they are using word Jaccard, cosine similarity and 3-gram shingle overlap. Highlights matched phrases and the longest common substring.

Written & reviewed by Helperzy Editorial Team · Updated July 2026

This is NOT a plagiarism checker. It compares only the two texts you paste below to each other — it does not search the web or any database.

Text A

Text B

Shingle by:
Enter text in both boxes to compare similarity.
100% Private — everything runs in your browser

How to Use Text Similarity Checker

1

Paste Both Texts

Enter the first text in the left box and the second text in the right box. They can be single sentences or long documents, and the tool tokenizes each one automatically the moment you stop typing.

2

Read the Three Scores

Look at the Jaccard, cosine, and 3-gram shingle percentages side by side. Each answers a different question about overlap, so compare them together rather than trusting any single number as the definitive verdict.

3

Inspect Matched Phrases

Review the highlighted shared phrases on both sides and the reported longest common substring. This shows exactly where the two texts overlap, which is far more informative than the summary percentages alone.

How Text Similarity Is Measured and What Each Score Means

A text similarity checker takes two pieces of writing and tells you how much they overlap, expressed as a number rather than a vague impression. Paste text into the left box and text into the right box, and you get three separate scores plus a visual map of the phrases they share. The three numbers exist because there is no single correct definition of similarity: two documents can share almost every word yet be arranged completely differently, or share a rare exact phrase while differing everywhere else. Editors comparing two drafts, teachers checking whether two submissions look suspiciously alike, and writers making sure a rewrite is genuinely different all need a way to see overlap that a quick read misses. The first score is word-set Jaccard similarity. Both texts are lowercased and split into a set of unique words, then the tool counts the words that appear in both sets and divides by the count of words that appear in either. A result of 1 means identical vocabulary and 0 means no shared words at all. The second score is cosine similarity on term-frequency vectors. Here word counts matter, not just presence, so a text that repeats a word ten times is treated differently from one that uses it once. The two texts become vectors of word frequencies, and the cosine of the angle between those vectors becomes the score. The third score is 3-gram shingle overlap. The text is broken into overlapping runs of three consecutive words, and the tool measures how many of those short sequences are shared. Because shingles preserve word order, this catches reordering that fools the word-set approach. Work through a concrete pair. Text A is the cat sat on the mat and Text B is the dog sat on the rug. The unique words in A are the, cat, sat, on, mat and in B are the, dog, sat, on, rug. The shared words are the, sat and on, which is three. The combined vocabulary is the, cat, sat, on, mat, dog, rug, which is seven. Jaccard is therefore 3 divided by 7, roughly 0.43. Cosine will read higher because the repeated word the appears in both and pulls the frequency vectors closer together. The 3-gram overlap will be lower still, because the sat on and sat on the are shared but the surrounding shingles differ. Three scores, one input pair, three honest angles on the same question. Specific situations make the three numbers useful together. A journal editor checks a resubmitted manuscript against the original and sees Jaccard near 0.95, confirming the author changed almost nothing despite claiming a rewrite. A content team compares a draft against a competitor page and reads a low 3-gram overlap as reassurance that no sentence-level copying happened. A student uses it to confirm that a paraphrase of a source shares meaning but not exact phrasing before submitting. The matched-phrase highlighter paints shared runs in colour on both sides, and the longest common substring is reported separately, so a single lifted sentence stands out even when the overall percentages look modest. The scores are directional signals, not verdicts, and reading all three at once is the point. One critical honesty note belongs here: this is not a plagiarism checker. A plagiarism checker compares your text against a live index of billions of web pages and published works, which requires a server and a crawled database. This tool only compares the two texts you paste against each other, so it can never tell you whether either one was copied from somewhere on the internet. It is built for comparing documents you already have, not for detecting copying from unknown sources. Everything runs locally in your browser; neither text is uploaded, stored, or logged, which makes it safe for unpublished manuscripts and confidential documents.

Examples: Text Similarity Checker

Input

A: "the cat sat on the mat" B: "the dog sat on the rug"

Result

Jaccard ≈ 0.43 · cosine higher · 3-gram overlap lower

Shared unique words are the, sat, on (3); combined unique vocabulary is the, cat, sat, on, mat, dog, rug (7); Jaccard = 3 ÷ 7 ≈ 0.43. Cosine reads higher because 'the' repeats in both and aligns the frequency vectors, while the 3-gram score is lower because most three-word sequences differ.

Input

A: "quick brown fox" B: "brown quick fox"

Result

Jaccard = 1.0 · cosine = 1.0 · 3-gram overlap low

Both texts contain exactly the same three words, so Jaccard and cosine both read 1.0 because they ignore order. The 3-gram shingle score is low because the ordered sequences 'quick brown fox' and 'brown quick fox' do not match, which is how shingles catch reordering.

Frequently Asked Questions – Text Similarity Checker

Jaccard measures shared unique words as a fraction of all unique words, ignoring how often each appears. Cosine similarity uses word frequencies, so repetition matters. The 3-gram shingle score compares overlapping runs of three consecutive words, which preserves order and catches reordering that word-set methods miss. Reading all three together gives a fuller picture.